When the Chicago Sky drafted Angel Reese using the seventh overall pick last year, there was widespread hope she could be a turning point. Although winning the championship in recent years, the Chicago team have been struggling competitively for most of their history. Reese brought not only celebrity but also dynamic play and dominance on the boards.
On the court, Reese has exceeded expectations: having become a back-to-back All-Star and has led the league in rebounds in both her first two WNBA seasons.
Yet within the team environment, tensions rose. Chicago were knocked out in the first round of the playoffs last season. This time around, they ended up with the joint-worst record in the entire WNBA, tied with the Dallas Wings.
The young star has not been shy about showing her feelings. After saying the team āneed to get better players ⦠have to get great playersā and implying sheād seek a trade if that didnāt happen, she issued an apology. āI really didnāt intentionally mean to disrespect my teammates,ā she said.
Team management subsequently penalized her for half a game for āstatements detrimental to the team.ā
From a professional perspective, calling out teammates is typically seen as unacceptable. But, did penalizing her and an official rebuke the appropriate response? It seemed as though the organization were attempting to publicly shame Reese.
She has been the target of online abuse since entering the league, partly due to her high-profile rivalry with another top rookie (a relationship both players have downplayed). By reprimanding her, the Sky opened the way for online critics to attack and misrepresent her.
This action looked excessive, and quickly backfired. Supporters overwhelmed social media with backing for their player. During the final home game, banners were visible in the stands saying āSupport Angelā, while others demanded the dismissal of general manager the front office leader.
This penalty was not only disproportionate, it was inconsistent with the rest of the league. Other WNBA stars have voiced concerns with their teams without being disciplined.
Pagliocca himself later echoed Reeseās sentiment about the necessity for improved roster construction ā the very thing she was suspended for. This contradiction was unmistakable: when Reese says it, itās defiance; when the general manager says it, itās a strategy.
Such a double standard is even worse when you reflect on how frequently African American athletes like Reese are criticized for being assertive.
The irony is that Reeseās clash with the management is only the most recent example in a lengthy dysfunctional narrative for the Sky.
They are a organization with a track record of running off star players. One legend, a former MVP, a hometown hero ā all left Chicago frustrated. A recent addition returned this season only to find things had not improved.
A respected analyst commented, āThere are so many players that might still be on the team right now but elected to leave the Chicago Sky due to their issues with the management.ā
āCould you imagine a Chicago team with its core stars? Thatās a championship caliber roster. But they have a history of squandering away their assets.ā
Firing head coach their recent coach only worsened the situation. Reese said the move left her ādevastatedā and stated that Weatherspoon was the only person who āhad genuine faith in meā as a Black woman in sports.
It is difficult to imagine a more insensitive move if the goal is to keep your biggest star content.
Maybe this would be easier to accept if the Sky were competing for titles. But the last two seasons have been, frankly, abysmal.
Last season they won a respectable number of their 30 games. In 2025, they won far fewer, finishing joint-last despite having two recently honored rookies. This yearās draft picks ā both highly skilled ā have had difficult seasons.
Even the draft has become a symbol of mismanagement. Recently, Chicago did not pick a rookie who blossomed into an All-Star on another team, instead trading her rights ā along with a future first-round pick ā for a veteran expected to leave in free agency.
They mortgaged their future for nothing, while their emerging talents struggled through another unsuccessful season.
It is little wonder that supporters are already debating where Reese might play next season. Teaming her with elite talents elsewhere are fantasy scenarios, but the reality is simple: she has choices.
She is a established star, still only at the start of her professional journey, and she merits an organization that treats her with the consideration she has rightfully gained.
If the athlete decides sheās had her fill of the Chicago Sky, few should be surprised. The blame will not fall on her. It will be squarely on an franchise that seems determined on pushing its best players away.