The French First Couple to Provide Scientific Proof in Federal Court Concerning Brigitte Macron's Sex

French President Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron will submit expert findings in a US court to confirm that Mrs. Macron never was born male, as stated by their attorney managing their slander legal action.

The Case

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron brought a lawsuit in July against conservative influencer a US-based personality, alleging that she spread defamatory allegations to boost her public platform and earn financial gain.

Owens asserted that she would “risk” her career on the assertion that the French first lady is assigned male at birth and went by the name a male identity. She has since reiterated these assertions across multiple media outlets.

Evidence Submission

Their lawyer stated that medical evidence would be presented in court to disprove the claims. Although details of the proof were withheld, their representative made clear that the Macrons is willing to establish without doubt that the claims are false.

“Scientific testimony will be presented that will be scientific in form,” Clare stated. “She is undertaking a process that Brigitte will have to subject herself to in a open way.”

Additionally added that images showing Brigitte pregnant and parenting her children would be presented as the support.

Personal History

As stated in the legal filing, Jean-Michel Trogneux is Brigitte’s elder sibling who is based in Amiens. Trogneux allegedly participated in Emmanuel’s swearing-in ceremonies in the last two terms.

Mrs. Macron, seventy-two, is two decades older than her President Macron. They first encountered each other when the future president was a student at a school where Brigitte taught a drama program. Brigitte has sons and daughters from a earlier union and multiple grandchildren.

Previous Legal Actions

Related claims surfaced in the French media in the past, leading to previous defamation cases against bloggers. Although Mrs. Macron and her family member at first won a libel suit, an judicial panel subsequently reversed the decision.

This latest lawsuit against the influencer claims that she disregarded reliable information and in its place amplified baseless claims.

The defendant’s attorneys have filed a motion to throw out the case, arguing that the venue is inappropriate. Regardless of the motion, the defendant has maintained her claims.